Cape Town - Regulations governing the
extensive trade in wild caught baby elephants require only that they are housed
in suitably equipped facilities, in appropriate and acceptable destinations,
however in reality conditions in these facilities fail to care for the welfare
of baby elephants.
The international trade in live wild African elephants was called
into question at the 69th meeting of the Standing Committee of
CITES (the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora) in Geneva. International
trade in wild baby elephants, especially from Zimbabwe to China, has been
taking place for
the past few years.
ALSO SEE: #ShockWildlifeTruths: African Elephant Coalition renews call for global ivory trade ban
Although live elephant
trade is legal under CITES, concern has been expressed over its impact on the
animals involved and on their families remaining in the wild. One of the few
stipulations that CITES requires is simply that the elephants are housed in
zoos and circuses that are “appropriate and acceptable”, a definition that has
been criticised as being too subjective and lacking in detail.
As a result, an information
document prepared by a group of concerned
organisations such as the National Councils of SPCAs, Humane Society International,
David Shepherd Wildlife Foundation and others was presented in the discussions pointing
out that “CITES had not established adequate guidance on what
“appropriate and acceptable” means.
Welfare concerns and woeful zoo conditions
findings show that zoos and other captive facilities are “woefully inadequate”
to house wild African elephants.
Keith Lindsay, a conservation biologist and
one of the authors of the information document says that “There is no captive
facility in the world suitably equipped to house and care for live, wild-caught
African elephants forcefully removed from their family groups in Africa.”
At the meeting, some countries of the African Elephant Coalition, comprising of 29 member countries from Africa, strongly
urged the Secretariat not to use wild African elephants to stock zoos around
SEE: US Centre for Biological Diversity sues Trump ahead of 'big-game trophy decision'
Ali Abagana, speaking for the
delegation of Niger told the gathering their country is “concerned about the
plight of African elephants, including juvenile animals, captured and sent to
captive facilities outside of the species’ range.” Abagana told the 600
delegates present that a “number of past captures have led to fatalities either
in transit or shortly after arrival”.
revision agreed upon at the CITES Conference of the Parties (CoP17) held in
Johannesburg last year, says elephants must not only be housed in a suitable
facility but be shown to benefit conservation of them in the wild. Abagana, however, pointed out that many elephant biologists,
including members of the IUCN
African Elephant Specialist Group,
have questioned whether live capture of elephants can be of any benefit to the
conservation of the species in the wild.
When Burkina Faso took the floor, it’s speaker,
Benoît Doamba, highlighted
“severe welfare concerns” with the captures and live trade of wild elephants
and pointed to recent
secret video footage of the last round of captures of juvenile elephants in
Zimbabwe, which revealed elephants being beaten and repeatedly kicked in the
reports revealed that Zimbabwe over-ruled the objections of it’s own
Scientific Authority to allow exports of baby elephants to China.
says Doamba, “following the worldwide public outcry, this convention should
fully recognise and address, not just the numerical status of wild species, but
the welfare status too.”
Thousands of wild elephants captured
It was not only
countries present that raised concerns. The report’s other author, Iris Ho,
Programme Manager for Humane Society International,
told the meeting that according to the CITES Trade database, 1 774 live,
wild-sourced African elephants were exported internationally between 1990 and 2015, including 583 animals for circuses and
travelling exhibitions and 331 animals for zoos.
SEE: #ShockWildilfeTruths: Burning elephant calf photograph highlights growing conflict
large number of animals involved,” says Ho, “the importance of these animals to
species conservation, and the need to protect their welfare for their own sake
and to reduce pressure on wild populations, it is within CITES’ authority to
ensure that conditions of housing and care at destination facilities and any
facilities to which animals are subsequently transferred to are “suitably
The CITES Secretariat sent the discussion
into an inter-sessional working group of both member countries, which included China, but notably not Zimbabwe, and NGOs. Potential improvements to the CITES
regulations on live elephant trade will be presented at the next Standing
Committee to be held in Russia in October 2018.
What to read next on Traveller24:
- #ShockWildlifeTruths: African Elephant Coalition renews call for global ivory trade ban
- US Centre for Biological Diversity sues Trump ahead of 'big-game trophy decision'
- #ShockWildilfeTruths: Burning elephant calf photograph highlights growing conflict